Blah, blah, blah

Why? Because it would require people to buy goods from private companies, without being able to opt-out.

So says Karl Manheim, a professor at Loyola Law School in Los Angeles, and Jamie Court, chairman of Consumer Watchdog in Santa Monica, Calif.

Don’t think that just because Clinton’s plan would have “covered everyone,” that it is better than Obama’s. Clinton’s plan would be a boon for the private insurance industry — not for families.

I guess it’s a moot point at this time; she can’t get the nomination.

To cover everyone, a better option is universal single payer government provided healthcare.